|
17/11/16
| |||
indianexpress.com/article/ india/india-news-india/bad- loan-financial-year-rti-rbi- bank-loan-raghuram-rajan-bad- loan-financial-year-rti-rbi- bank-loan-raghuram-rajan- 1140000000000-bad-debts-the- great-govt-bank-write-off/
Rs 1.14 lakh crore of bad debts: The great government bank write-off
That is the amount of bad loans waived in last three financial years,
more than the write-off in the previous nine
WRITTEN BY UTKARSH ANAND | NEW DELHI |
Updated: February 9, 2016 8:36 Am
Twenty-nine state-owned banks wrote off a total of Rs 1.14 lakh crore
of bad debts between financial years 2013 and 2015, much more than
they had done in the preceding nine years.
In response to an RTI application filed by The Indian Express, the RBI
disclosed that while bad debts stood at Rs 15,551 crore for the
financial year ending March 2012, they had shot up by over three times
to Rs 52,542 crore by the end of March 2015.
Asked about the details of the biggest defaulters, whether individuals
or business entities, whose bad debts to the tune of Rs 100 crore or
more had been written off, the RBI said: “The required information is
not available with us.” Banks are required to report the bad debts on
a consolidated basis, it said.
Related
Who waived loans of defaulters? Some Govt banks say it’s secret,
others point to panels
Bad debts: RBI gives Supreme Court defaulter list, with confidentiality rider
Bad debts: Write-offs big fraud, give us defaulter list, orders Supreme Court
Even as the government has been trying to shore up public sector banks
through equity capital and other measures, bad loans written off by
them between 2004 and 2015 amount to more than Rs 2.11 lakh crore.
More than half such loans (Rs 1,14,182 crore) have been waived off
between 2013 and 2015.
Only two banks, State Bank of Saurashtra and State Bank of Indore,
have shown zero bad debts in the past five years.
In other words, while bad loans of public-sector banks grew at a rate
of 4 per cent between 2004 and 2012, in financial years 2013 to 2015,
they rose at almost 60 per cent. The bad debts written off in
financial year ending March 2015 make up 85 per cent of such loans
since 2013.
The RTI reply also disclosed that bad debts have declined only four
times since 2004. The last time was in 2011.
An analysis of the information available with the RBI till 2012-13
also shows that between 2009 and 2013, both the advances by public
sector banks to individuals and business entities as well as their
amount of bad debts written off doubled. From 0.33 per cent of total
advances in 2009, bad debts rose to 0.61 per cent in 2013.
Bank-wise break-up shows State Bank of India, India’s largest bank, is
way ahead of others in declaring loans as unrecoverable, with its bad
debts shooting up almost four times since 2013 — from Rs 5,594 crore
in 2013 to Rs 21,313 crore in 2015.
In fact, SBI’s bad debts made up 40 per cent of the total amount
written off by all other banks in 2015 and were more than what 20
other banks wrote off. In 2014 too, the bank’s bad debts alone
comprised 38 per cent of the total of all banks. The figure of bad
loans for 2014 and ‘15 combined, Rs 34,490 crore, was Rs 10,000 crore
more than that for between 2004 and 2013, Rs 23,992 crore.
The country’s second-largest public sector bank, Punjab National Bank,
has also witnessed a consistent rise in bad debts since 2013. These
grew by 95 per cent between 2013 and 2014 but climbed by 238 per cent
between 2014 and 2015 — from Rs 1,947 crore in 2014 to Rs 6,587 crore
in 2015.
Reserve Bank Governor Raghuram Rajan has repeatedly expressed concern
over the health of public-sector banks, and pushed for steps to ensure
that banks classify certain stressed assets as non-performing assets
(NPAs) and make adequate provisions to “strengthen their balance
sheets”, besides working out schemes of merger.
With public sector banks sitting on over Rs 7 lakh crore stressed
assets, including NPAs and restructured loans, Rajan recently said the
estimates of NPAs being 17-18 per cent are bit on the high side and
that entities should be careful not to treat NPAs as total write-offs
but see if they can change promoters and repay as the economy
recovers. He also said that some banks would have to merge to optimise
their use of resources.
Gross NPAs of public-sector banks rose to 6.03 per cent as of June
2015, from 5.20 per cent in March 2015. RBI has asked banks to review
certain loan accounts and their classification over the two quarters
ending December 31, 2015, and March 31, 2016.
WRITE BACK
Editors Note: In response to the above story, published in The Indian
Express on February 8, 2015, the Union ministry of finance, the
Reserve Bank of India and the country’s largest bank, State Bank of
India, have written back stating that the write-offs are an accounting
entry to meet regulatory guidelines.
Ministry of Finance: The fact of the matter is that write-offs are
basically technical and are done within the framework of Income Tax
Act, 1961 and RBI Guidelines regarding provisions for bad loans as per
Standard Accounting Practices.
Banks write-off advances at Head Office level as part of the balance
sheet cleaning exercise and these loans continue to remain outstanding
in the branch books. Recovery efforts continue to be made in the
respective branches with respect to these bad loans. Write-off does
not mean that recovery comes to a stop.
Reserve Bank of India: ‘Writing off’ of non-performing assets is a
regular exercise conducted by banks to clean up their balance sheets.
Substantial portion of this write-off is, however, technical in
nature. It is primarily intended at cleansing the balance sheet and
achieving taxation efficiency. In ‘Technically Written Off’ accounts,
loans are written off from the books at the Head Office, without
foregoing the right to recovery. Further, write offs are generally
carried out against accumulated provisions made for such loans. Once
recovered, the provisions made for those loans flow back into the
profit and loss account of banks.
The data published in the above news item is the total write-off made
by banks, which includes a large portion of technically written off
accounts where the recovery efforts continue as usual.
State Bank of India: We would like to point that SBI has a loan book
of Rs 13,70,701 crore and the net NPAs are Rs 28,592 crore as on
September 2015, which represent 2.14% of the advances. Standalone
figures may appear big, however if you look at the overall size of SBI
and its net NPAs, it can be seen that we are amongst the most
efficient public sector banks in India. Moreover, our NPA figures have
been improving over the last few years. It is pertinent to mention
that SBI is 2.8 times larger than the next largest bank in the country
in terms of business.
Writing off a bad debt is an accounting entry to meet the regulatory
guidelines. Writing off an amount does not mean it is a total loss as
our legal team continues the recovery process and in due course
recoveries are effected in the written off accounts, which are then
added to the profits of the bank for that year. During the year ended
March 2015, our bank recovered Rs 2,300 crores from the written-off
accounts. We would herein like to add that for recovery, our legal
systems and processes are most robust and reliable in the entire
banking system.
Our Correspondent replies: The report is based on a response from the
Reserve Bank of India to an RTI application filed after the December
16, 2015, Supreme Court judgment, which said the banking regulator was
bound in law to give information regarding private and public banks
under the Right To Information Act. “RBI is supposed to uphold public
interest and not the interest of individual banks. We have surmised
that many financial institutions have resorted to such acts which are
neither clean nor transparent. The RBI in association with them has
been trying to cover up their acts from public scrutiny,” said a bench
of Justices M Y Eqbal and C Nagappan.
The RBI has noted that the total write-offs includes a large portion
of technically written-off accounts where the recovery efforts
continue as usual. Therein lies the problem. After a technical
write-off, there is no incentive for banks to pursue recovery, as
noted by RBI’s former deputy governor KC Chakrabarty in the past.
Given the humongous bad loan problem at hand, the write-offs cannot be
seen as just housekeeping. The Rs 1,14,000 crore written off over just
the last three years (2012-13 to 2014-15) is more than the write-off
over the previous nine years. So acute is the problem that both the
Union finance ministry and NITI Aayog have separately pitched for
setting up a government-owned asset reconstruction company to take
over banks’ bad assets.
Most importantly, write-offs force the government to commit large
dollops of capital so that banks continue to undertake normal lending
operations in the coming years. The finance ministry has proposed to
infuse Rs 70,000 crore over the next four years, which may not be
enough. Capital infusion by the government is always at the taxpayers’
expense. Setting aside moneys from the Budget for this only precludes
higher allocation for critical sectors such as health and education.
First Published on: February 8, 2016 3:43 am
Rs 1.14 lakh crore of bad debts: The great government bank write-off
That is the amount of bad loans waived in last three financial years,
more than the write-off in the previous nine
WRITTEN BY UTKARSH ANAND | NEW DELHI |
Updated: February 9, 2016 8:36 Am
Twenty-nine state-owned banks wrote off a total of Rs 1.14 lakh crore
of bad debts between financial years 2013 and 2015, much more than
they had done in the preceding nine years.
In response to an RTI application filed by The Indian Express, the RBI
disclosed that while bad debts stood at Rs 15,551 crore for the
financial year ending March 2012, they had shot up by over three times
to Rs 52,542 crore by the end of March 2015.
Asked about the details of the biggest defaulters, whether individuals
or business entities, whose bad debts to the tune of Rs 100 crore or
more had been written off, the RBI said: “The required information is
not available with us.” Banks are required to report the bad debts on
a consolidated basis, it said.
Related
Who waived loans of defaulters? Some Govt banks say it’s secret,
others point to panels
Bad debts: RBI gives Supreme Court defaulter list, with confidentiality rider
Bad debts: Write-offs big fraud, give us defaulter list, orders Supreme Court
Even as the government has been trying to shore up public sector banks
through equity capital and other measures, bad loans written off by
them between 2004 and 2015 amount to more than Rs 2.11 lakh crore.
More than half such loans (Rs 1,14,182 crore) have been waived off
between 2013 and 2015.
Only two banks, State Bank of Saurashtra and State Bank of Indore,
have shown zero bad debts in the past five years.
In other words, while bad loans of public-sector banks grew at a rate
of 4 per cent between 2004 and 2012, in financial years 2013 to 2015,
they rose at almost 60 per cent. The bad debts written off in
financial year ending March 2015 make up 85 per cent of such loans
since 2013.
The RTI reply also disclosed that bad debts have declined only four
times since 2004. The last time was in 2011.
An analysis of the information available with the RBI till 2012-13
also shows that between 2009 and 2013, both the advances by public
sector banks to individuals and business entities as well as their
amount of bad debts written off doubled. From 0.33 per cent of total
advances in 2009, bad debts rose to 0.61 per cent in 2013.
Bank-wise break-up shows State Bank of India, India’s largest bank, is
way ahead of others in declaring loans as unrecoverable, with its bad
debts shooting up almost four times since 2013 — from Rs 5,594 crore
in 2013 to Rs 21,313 crore in 2015.
In fact, SBI’s bad debts made up 40 per cent of the total amount
written off by all other banks in 2015 and were more than what 20
other banks wrote off. In 2014 too, the bank’s bad debts alone
comprised 38 per cent of the total of all banks. The figure of bad
loans for 2014 and ‘15 combined, Rs 34,490 crore, was Rs 10,000 crore
more than that for between 2004 and 2013, Rs 23,992 crore.
The country’s second-largest public sector bank, Punjab National Bank,
has also witnessed a consistent rise in bad debts since 2013. These
grew by 95 per cent between 2013 and 2014 but climbed by 238 per cent
between 2014 and 2015 — from Rs 1,947 crore in 2014 to Rs 6,587 crore
in 2015.
Reserve Bank Governor Raghuram Rajan has repeatedly expressed concern
over the health of public-sector banks, and pushed for steps to ensure
that banks classify certain stressed assets as non-performing assets
(NPAs) and make adequate provisions to “strengthen their balance
sheets”, besides working out schemes of merger.
With public sector banks sitting on over Rs 7 lakh crore stressed
assets, including NPAs and restructured loans, Rajan recently said the
estimates of NPAs being 17-18 per cent are bit on the high side and
that entities should be careful not to treat NPAs as total write-offs
but see if they can change promoters and repay as the economy
recovers. He also said that some banks would have to merge to optimise
their use of resources.
Gross NPAs of public-sector banks rose to 6.03 per cent as of June
2015, from 5.20 per cent in March 2015. RBI has asked banks to review
certain loan accounts and their classification over the two quarters
ending December 31, 2015, and March 31, 2016.
WRITE BACK
Editors Note: In response to the above story, published in The Indian
Express on February 8, 2015, the Union ministry of finance, the
Reserve Bank of India and the country’s largest bank, State Bank of
India, have written back stating that the write-offs are an accounting
entry to meet regulatory guidelines.
Ministry of Finance: The fact of the matter is that write-offs are
basically technical and are done within the framework of Income Tax
Act, 1961 and RBI Guidelines regarding provisions for bad loans as per
Standard Accounting Practices.
Banks write-off advances at Head Office level as part of the balance
sheet cleaning exercise and these loans continue to remain outstanding
in the branch books. Recovery efforts continue to be made in the
respective branches with respect to these bad loans. Write-off does
not mean that recovery comes to a stop.
Reserve Bank of India: ‘Writing off’ of non-performing assets is a
regular exercise conducted by banks to clean up their balance sheets.
Substantial portion of this write-off is, however, technical in
nature. It is primarily intended at cleansing the balance sheet and
achieving taxation efficiency. In ‘Technically Written Off’ accounts,
loans are written off from the books at the Head Office, without
foregoing the right to recovery. Further, write offs are generally
carried out against accumulated provisions made for such loans. Once
recovered, the provisions made for those loans flow back into the
profit and loss account of banks.
The data published in the above news item is the total write-off made
by banks, which includes a large portion of technically written off
accounts where the recovery efforts continue as usual.
State Bank of India: We would like to point that SBI has a loan book
of Rs 13,70,701 crore and the net NPAs are Rs 28,592 crore as on
September 2015, which represent 2.14% of the advances. Standalone
figures may appear big, however if you look at the overall size of SBI
and its net NPAs, it can be seen that we are amongst the most
efficient public sector banks in India. Moreover, our NPA figures have
been improving over the last few years. It is pertinent to mention
that SBI is 2.8 times larger than the next largest bank in the country
in terms of business.
Writing off a bad debt is an accounting entry to meet the regulatory
guidelines. Writing off an amount does not mean it is a total loss as
our legal team continues the recovery process and in due course
recoveries are effected in the written off accounts, which are then
added to the profits of the bank for that year. During the year ended
March 2015, our bank recovered Rs 2,300 crores from the written-off
accounts. We would herein like to add that for recovery, our legal
systems and processes are most robust and reliable in the entire
banking system.
Our Correspondent replies: The report is based on a response from the
Reserve Bank of India to an RTI application filed after the December
16, 2015, Supreme Court judgment, which said the banking regulator was
bound in law to give information regarding private and public banks
under the Right To Information Act. “RBI is supposed to uphold public
interest and not the interest of individual banks. We have surmised
that many financial institutions have resorted to such acts which are
neither clean nor transparent. The RBI in association with them has
been trying to cover up their acts from public scrutiny,” said a bench
of Justices M Y Eqbal and C Nagappan.
The RBI has noted that the total write-offs includes a large portion
of technically written-off accounts where the recovery efforts
continue as usual. Therein lies the problem. After a technical
write-off, there is no incentive for banks to pursue recovery, as
noted by RBI’s former deputy governor KC Chakrabarty in the past.
Given the humongous bad loan problem at hand, the write-offs cannot be
seen as just housekeeping. The Rs 1,14,000 crore written off over just
the last three years (2012-13 to 2014-15) is more than the write-off
over the previous nine years. So acute is the problem that both the
Union finance ministry and NITI Aayog have separately pitched for
setting up a government-owned asset reconstruction company to take
over banks’ bad assets.
Most importantly, write-offs force the government to commit large
dollops of capital so that banks continue to undertake normal lending
operations in the coming years. The finance ministry has proposed to
infuse Rs 70,000 crore over the next four years, which may not be
enough. Capital infusion by the government is always at the taxpayers’
expense. Setting aside moneys from the Budget for this only precludes
higher allocation for critical sectors such as health and education.
First Published on: February 8, 2016 3:43 am
கருத்துகள் இல்லை:
கருத்துரையிடுக